RALEIGH: US appeals court reverses Outer Banks bridge work - CBS 3 Springfield - WSHM

US appeals court reverses Outer Banks bridge work

Posted: Updated:
The dispute centers on a state plan to replicate the existing 2.5-mile bridge across Oregon Inlet at a cost of $216 million. The bridge is the only span connecting the mainland to Hatteras Island. The dispute centers on a state plan to replicate the existing 2.5-mile bridge across Oregon Inlet at a cost of $216 million. The bridge is the only span connecting the mainland to Hatteras Island.
RALEIGH, N.C. -

A federal appeals court panel on Wednesday unanimously rejected North Carolina's plan to replace a crucial Outer Banks bridge without rerouting a state highway away from a wildlife refuge.

The dispute centers on a plan to replicate the existing 2.5-mile Bonner Bridge across Oregon Inlet at a cost of $216 million. The bridge is the only span connecting the mainland to Hatteras Island and was designed to last 30 years when built in 1963.

Construction has been blocked by a lawsuit by environmental groups, who favor a 17-mile bridge that would bypass the Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge. The route favored by environmentalists would require building the second-longest bridge in the United States at a cost of more than $1 billion, state transportation officials said.

Environmentalists counter that changing the route would also help avoid recurring problems with the current road, which is frequently rendered impassable by water and sand kicked up by storms.

"At the heart of this case are the past and future of the Outer Banks," Judge James Wynn wrote for the three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. "The effects of time threaten the structural integrity of the Bonner Bridge, while large storms and changing coastal conditions threaten the viability of the non-elevated portions of North Carolina Highway 12 south of the Bonner Bridge."

The appeals court overruled a federal judge's order last September allowing North Carolina an exception to laws protecting a wildlife refuge.

Opponents argued the state's replacement plan leaves out the cost of moving or maintaining about 12 miles of N.C. 12 through the wildlife refuge. The highway has been breached by new inlets twice in the past several years. Environmentalists said the shorter bridge will be useless without additional infrastructure construction.

The road was closed for three days early last month after waves churned by Hurricane Arthur caused a small section of the fragile roadway to buckle.

The bridge was closed for nearly two weeks in December because sand had washed away from the bridge supports. That closing led to a series of broadsides by the state's top Republican leaders against the environmental lawsuit.

Senate leader Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, and House Speaker Thom Tillis, R-Mecklenburg, condemned the environmental law firm fighting replacement of the 50-year-old bridge as "liberal elitists."

Transportation Secretary Tony Tata attacked the Southern Environmental Law Center as "ivory tower elitists." The center's attorneys were fighting in court "with their lattes and their contempt, and chuckle while the good people of the Outer Banks are fighting hard to scratch out a living here based on tourism and based on access," Tata said.

SELC attorney Julie Youngman countered that Tata was distracting people from the DOT's failure to plan a reliable route that would not be repeatedly washed out in coming decades.

The federal court, in its decision, said the lower court must specifically look at federal regulations regarding Section 4(f) lands, which are lands protected by the federal Department of Transportation Act of 1966. The key provision is that the Federal Highway Administration and other DOT agencies can't use lands from publicly owned parks and wildlife areas unless there is no prudent alternative and the plan minimizes the harm to the property.

The Court of Appeals, in the decision, said, "If there are no feasible and prudent alternatives to using Section 4(f) property, the Secretary may select only the alternative that “[c]auses the least overall harm in light of [Section 4(f)'s] preservation purpose.”

RELATED LINK
Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
  • Trending Stories on WNCN.com

Powered by WorldNow
WSHM
Powered by WorldNow CNN
All content © 2014, WSHM; Springfield, MA. (A Meredith Corporation Station) and WorldNow. All Rights Reserved.
For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.