Public Hearing on Casino Gambling

Tools

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

By Miranda Grossman

The cards are still on the table for people on both sides of the casino issue. Supporters and opponents will have a chance to weigh-in during a public hearing at the State House.

When there is talk about legalizing gambling and opening a casino in Massachusetts, do not expect anyone on either side of the issue to fold.

"With demand for new revenue, the only alternative that seems to be on the table is casino gambling," Rep. Thomas Petrolati of Ludlow said.

"Looking for a quick fix, which in the long run will be an economic drain," Monson native Kathleen Norbut said. She is the president of United to Stop Slots in Massachusetts.

Mohegan Sun already purchased property off the Massachusetts Turnpike in Palmer, with plans to build a one billion dollar resort casino. First lawmakers have to legalize it. They are expected to hold their first public hearing this session about casino gambling on Thursday in Boston. Everyone is preparing, including Norbut.

"It is a predatory business. They depend upon extracting money from gambling addicts," Norbut said.

Norbut said job creation and economic development have been wildly inflated by the casino industry.

"Foxwoods, large casinos, Swift River go into bankruptcy, we know this is not a business that it promises to be," she said.

However, the possibility of new revenue is exactly what moved Petrolati to change his opinion.

"I previously voted against casino gambling on three occasions. I am now extremely open to it, based on the economic need for this commonwealth to find a new revenue source," Petrolati said. "When you are looking at an additional $600 million coming from 9C cuts the Governor is proposing, on top of the fact that we have just cut a billion dollars in last years fiscal budget, I see no other alternative at this juncture."

Wednesday, Oct 28 at 6:30 AM MiddleboroRemembers wrote ...

The experience of others has proven that for each $1 in revenue, the cost to taxpayers is $3. The state simply can't afford to subsidize wealthy casino investors. If predatory gambling were a viable solution, the streets of California would be paved with gold.

Wednesday, Oct 28 at 12:48 AM Freeman wrote ...

Casinos dont produce anything period! Lottery can go if they want. No money paid in to the lottery ever goes to no one. Its the interest they pay out. Government keeps it all.

Monday, Oct 26 at 10:10 PM Hank wrote ...

then if they don't want a casino mass then do away with the lottery also it take away money from people too

Monday, Oct 26 at 8:22 PM Joe wrote ...

Thanks Kathy, I don't know how to conduct my life. I'm glad I have people like you to tell me what I can and can't do, God knows I missed my parent's doing it for me. Kathy, I want to buy a motorcycle, but they're dangerous! Please outlaw them so I can't buy one!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

CBS 3 Springfield and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

More Good Stuff

Weather

Icon
Current Temp 53.0 °F
Fair
Wind : West at 9.2 MPH (8 KT)
Humidity : 54 %
Pressure : 1014.6 mb
More Weather

Weather

More Weather

On Demand

Stock Quotes

WHYN NewsTalk 560
This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.